No. 91-CF-5.District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
May 24, 1995.
Before WAGNER, Chief Judge; FERREN, TERRY, STEADMAN,
Page 1036
SCHWELB, FARRELL,[*] KING, and RUIZ, Associate Judges; BELSON, Senior Judge.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED by the merits division that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of November 10, 1994, are hereby vacated. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before June 5, 1995.
HYUN JIN MOON, et al., Appellants, V. THE FAMILY FEDERATION FOR WORLD PEACE AND UNIFICATION…
John R. GAY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 4359.District of Columbia Court of Appeals.…
CUNNINGHAM ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v. Richard W. DUGAN and Ernst Young, Appellees. No. 94-CV-500.District of Columbia…
ABBOTT v. FANT. No. 199.Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. July 19,…
Janet Clark, Petitioner, v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, Respondent, BMA Capitol Hill,…
Mitchell MERRIWEATHER, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 82-958.District of Columbia Court of Appeals.Argued…